Coal ash contains 13 times more Thorium Energy than Coal?

Discuss life, the universe, and everything with other members of this site. Get to know your fellow polywell enthusiasts.

Moderators: tonybarry, MSimon

Post Reply
choff
Posts: 2447
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 5:02 am
Location: Vancouver, Canada

Coal ash contains 13 times more Thorium Energy than Coal?

Post by choff »

Heard the claim that coal ash contains 13 times more energy from the Thorium in it than the actual coal that was burned.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T2wa6Pk ... AxFmee1oSA
CHoff

hanelyp
Posts: 2261
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 8:50 pm

Re: Coal ash contains 13 times more Thorium Energy than Coal

Post by hanelyp »

I've heard that ash from coal releases far more radioactivity than a reasonably operated nuclear facility.
The daylight is uncomfortably bright for eyes so long in the dark.

KitemanSA
Posts: 6179
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 3:05 pm
Location: OlyPen WA

Re: Coal ash contains 13 times more Thorium Energy than Coal

Post by KitemanSA »

My recollection is that the values are 5X from uranium and ~7X from thorium. I might be misremembering a bit.

paperburn1
Posts: 2484
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2009 5:53 am
Location: Third rock from the sun.

Re: Coal ash contains 13 times more Thorium Energy than Coal

Post by paperburn1 »

That of course does not include a "meltdown"
I am not a nuclear physicist, but play one on the internet.

KitemanSA
Posts: 6179
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 3:05 pm
Location: OlyPen WA

Re: Coal ash contains 13 times more Thorium Energy than Coal

Post by KitemanSA »

A melt-down isn't a "reasonably operating nuclear facility". But actually, it should include a meltdown, just not a dispersive hydrogen explosion.

JLawson
Posts: 424
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2008 6:31 pm
Location: Georgia
Contact:

Re: Coal ash contains 13 times more Thorium Energy than Coal

Post by JLawson »

KitemanSA wrote:A melt-down isn't a "reasonably operating nuclear facility". But actually, it should include a meltdown, just not a dispersive hydrogen explosion.
Besides, meltdowns are usually caused by something going stupidly wrong (as in Chernobyl and TMI) or catastrophically wrong (such as Fukushima, where the design was ALMOST good enough to withstand an earthquake and tsunami an order of magnitude greater than it was designed for) - and we've learned from mistakes.

After all, it doesn't take much to harden a reactor in Germany against tsunamis...
When opinion and reality conflict - guess which one is going to win in the long run.

ladajo
Posts: 6258
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 11:18 pm
Location: North East Coast

Re: Coal ash contains 13 times more Thorium Energy than Coal

Post by ladajo »

TMI is not even near the same league as the other two.
The development of atomic power, though it could confer unimaginable blessings on mankind, is something that is dreaded by the owners of coal mines and oil wells. (Hazlitt)
What I want to do is to look up C. . . . I call him the Forgotten Man. (Sumner)

KitemanSA
Posts: 6179
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 3:05 pm
Location: OlyPen WA

Re: Coal ash contains 13 times more Thorium Energy than Coal

Post by KitemanSA »

ladajo wrote:TMI is not even near the same league as the other two.
IIRC, the only real difference between TMI and Fuku is that at TMI, someone had the stacks to say FU and vent the H2 outdoors rather than letting it accumulate to explosive levels within the containment.

Post Reply