Talk-Polywell.org

She's certainly better qualified than the guy we've got right now:

https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=10 ... =2&theater

GIThruster wrote:She's certainly better qualified than the guy we've got right now:

https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=10 ... =2&theater

I would not be surprised if an actual five year old girl could be a better President than someone who acts like one.

End of Christie's run?

http://www.nj.com/politics/index.ssf/20 ... exxon.html

I almost did a spit-take when I clicked on that and saw Ellen. I presume you mean her adorable and precocious guest.

She needs a few years of seasoning first, and there's that pesky little Constitutional requirement for age. But I see the potential.

Anybody good with Photoshop? Put her on a couple of crates at the podium in the press briefing room?

I always wondered if we ran the wrong Dole. Elizabeth had potential. She's responsible for the FAA having a Commercial Space Transportation group.

Here's a good Ellen.

http://ellenbrown.com/

At this point I'm looking at Scott Walker, Ted Cruz, and Ben Carson favorably. Jeb Bush is very unlikely to get my vote in the primary.

Rand Paul sounds great on domestic policy, but I'm not so sure on foreign policy. At his worst he'd be an improvement on the current putz.

The line up for 2016 resembles the Muppet show with one character a greater laughing stock than the other.
I hope some miracle happens, because in this household no one supports Hillary, or Jeb.
Nor him
http://deadstate.org/ben-carson-god-gav ... n-a-dream/
Nor him
http://thinkprogress.org/election/2015/ ... jade-helm/

Rand Paul is half good and half bad to me. IMHO he has the right ideas when it comes to foreign policy (look inwards, stay out of trouble) and the whole security nonsense and I agree with some of his libertarian ideas, but there are other things that would be really bad for me personally. So he would not get support here, either.