It seems interesting:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F4I5mgBKPZY
Quantum Transitions
-
kunkmiester
- Posts: 892
- Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2009 3:51 pm
- Contact:
Wow, I almost understand all that. Very interesting.
So, he's got one of my three keys: He's explained things that current physics explains, but simpler in some cases.
He's got part of the second: Phenomena that are observed, but not adequately explained by current science, seem to work out better this way.
The third was hinted at, but not covered: Reformation requires that the new theories predict an entirely new phenomena, that can then be tested for.
This will be interesting.
So, he's got one of my three keys: He's explained things that current physics explains, but simpler in some cases.
He's got part of the second: Phenomena that are observed, but not adequately explained by current science, seem to work out better this way.
The third was hinted at, but not covered: Reformation requires that the new theories predict an entirely new phenomena, that can then be tested for.
This will be interesting.
Evil is evil, no matter how small
I put the video up here along with links to some of the texts in the video:
http://powerandcontrol.blogspot.com/201 ... amics.html
Also at IEC Fusion Technology and Classical Values.
http://powerandcontrol.blogspot.com/201 ... amics.html
Also at IEC Fusion Technology and Classical Values.
Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a profit.
Yeah. When I was doing work for the Navy we always called it Spa War or preferentially Spa Wars.ladajo wrote:Hmmm.
And for the record, it is "Spay War" or "Spa War", not spawer.
Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command
urghhh.
I cant wait for my new flying toaster with built in infinite power source. :D
i.e. a fight with some beauties in a hot tub.
Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a profit.
-
jlumartinez
- Posts: 143
- Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 7:29 pm
- Location: Spain
It ranks pretty high on the ol' crackpot index, so...
Except for George Miley. And Cold Fusion.wisnij wrote:It ranks pretty high on the ol' crackpot index, so...
The one reaction I got from my Fusion list (not public) so far was positive.
And it does not contradict physics. It just gives a different way to calculate the numbers which is consistent with known facts (the radius of the hydrogen atom).
Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a profit.
wrt the mentioned "speed of sound = speed of light"
I wonder how this might relate: Caltech Scientists First to Trap Light and Sound Vibrations Together in Nanocrystal
I wonder how this might relate: Caltech Scientists First to Trap Light and Sound Vibrations Together in Nanocrystal
In theory there is no difference between theory and practice, but in practice there is.
I think I'm understanding some of this - finding a similar constant in these two disparate experiments allowed this guy to backtrack the source of the constant to the energy of electrons jumping from one orbit to another.
By assuming the effects of these experiments was due to a resonance, he was able to use classical equations to describe it, and the results not only replicate results of quantum equations (using classical equations), but provides a new mathematical bridge between the two that may allow for prediction of entirely new results, and explanation for known anomalies that neither describe.
Pretty exciting, if it pans out, but how does gravity work its way in there? Is it simply an assumption that gravity (or effect of gravity on the resonating material) has the same frequency constant as this transitional state, because of the other experiment's results? The video doesn't really describe this well, mathematically or otherwise.
By assuming the effects of these experiments was due to a resonance, he was able to use classical equations to describe it, and the results not only replicate results of quantum equations (using classical equations), but provides a new mathematical bridge between the two that may allow for prediction of entirely new results, and explanation for known anomalies that neither describe.
Pretty exciting, if it pans out, but how does gravity work its way in there? Is it simply an assumption that gravity (or effect of gravity on the resonating material) has the same frequency constant as this transitional state, because of the other experiment's results? The video doesn't really describe this well, mathematically or otherwise.
Perrin Ehlinger