10KW LENR demonstrator (new thread)

Point out news stories, on the net or in mainstream media, related to polywell fusion.

Moderators: tonybarry, MSimon

stefanbanev
Posts: 183
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2011 3:12 am

Post by stefanbanev »

parallel wrote:ScottL
Who cares if you can't wait?
Well, LENR gets more public exposure if more people are curious even if they are skeptics.

MSimon
Posts: 14335
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:37 pm
Location: Rockford, Illinois
Contact:

Re: Sale Made per peswiki tweet

Post by MSimon »

Rick Meisinger wrote:Sale made per PESnetwork tweet:

PESNetwork PES Network, Inc.
Q&A just finished; reading of results; 470 kW maintained continuously during self-sustain; customer satisfied; sale made; more later.
Is the customer going to get a 50% discount for half power?
Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a profit.

seedload
Posts: 1062
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2008 8:16 pm

Re: Sale Made per peswiki tweet

Post by seedload »

MSimon wrote:
Rick Meisinger wrote:Sale made per PESnetwork tweet:

PESNetwork PES Network, Inc.
Q&A just finished; reading of results; 470 kW maintained continuously during self-sustain; customer satisfied; sale made; more later.
Is the customer going to get a 50% discount for half power?
That's a secret.

Rick Meisinger
Posts: 29
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 6:51 pm

Re: Sale Made per peswiki tweet

Post by Rick Meisinger »

MSimon wrote:
Rick Meisinger wrote:Sale made per PESnetwork tweet:

PESNetwork PES Network, Inc.
Q&A just finished; reading of results; 470 kW maintained continuously during self-sustain; customer satisfied; sale made; more later.
Is the customer going to get a 50% discount for half power?
It's a little early to start talking numbers. The customer is likely aware that the performance numbers would look better over a longer sustained test and AR's device must have met their predetermined parameters.

KitemanSA
Posts: 6188
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 3:05 pm
Location: OlyPen WA

Post by KitemanSA »

Giorgio wrote:
KitemanSA wrote:
Giorgio wrote: Proton tunnelling should not be confused with proton ability to actually bypass the Debye limit and fuse with a target.
Sorry, in what way is debye relevant here?
It is not relevant at all. I was reading a pdf about Debye limit in absence of magnetic field right before I wrote the post and I wrote Debye instead of Coulomb repulsion.
Thanks for pointing it out.
Whew! I thought I was going to have to re-learn everything! You are welcome. :)

MSimon
Posts: 14335
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:37 pm
Location: Rockford, Illinois
Contact:

Re: Sale Made per peswiki tweet

Post by MSimon »

seedload wrote:
MSimon wrote:
Rick Meisinger wrote:Sale made per PESnetwork tweet:

PESNetwork PES Network, Inc.
Q&A just finished; reading of results; 470 kW maintained continuously during self-sustain; customer satisfied; sale made; more later.
Is the customer going to get a 50% discount for half power?
That's a secret.
ROTFLMAO. LOLs. and LULZ too!
Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a profit.

parallel
Posts: 1131
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 8:24 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA

Post by parallel »

Wonder what these geniuses will write now. Does TomClarke still insist LENR doesn't exist?
Any guesses? Obviously instrument/measurement error. It's only 470kW Easy to get that wrong.
Helius

All Rossi does is generate buzz among the really stupid. Nowhere in all these threads can any of this be characterized as good science, engineering, or business. Moron to thief cash flows aren't as old as hooking, but really old nevertheless.
TomClarke


Well, funding Rossi is no more extravagant than funding people to stare at goats...

Instead of keeping his head down, or demonstrtaing working truck, he demonstrates a truck which cannot actually move but claims it is working. Not very practical. Or truthful.

icarus
Posts: 819
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 12:48 am

Post by icarus »

MSimon wrote:
I just got back from my turn. I was able to shoot a few pictures and take some video. The reason for the embargo on taking photos was personnel reasons. They don't want the engineers and testers to be shown, to keep them confidential. The company doing the testing does not wish to be known at this time.
Secret engineers. Secret companies. Secret customers. Secret results.

I have an opinion on all this but I am unable to give it to you. Its a secret.
What we talking about here Navy's Polywell project?

MSimon
Posts: 14335
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:37 pm
Location: Rockford, Illinois
Contact:

Post by MSimon »

I have never heard of a business in normal times being willing to accept a plant that produces half its rated output with the promise that things will be better later.

What I would do as an engineer is to recommend that there be no acceptance until we got what we paid for.

This does not ring true.

I expect that the next thing we will see is that the "470" is a typo and the real number is "970".

Although in a conservatively designed piece of eqpt. I'd expect to see numbers like "1,030" indicating that the plant has some reserve margin for the inevitable degradation with age. Or possible missteps in installation.

Of course if the secret customer and the secretive Rossi are in collusion all bets are off. Well not yet to be sure. Eventually the marks (most of them) wise up. The rest get fleeced. Proving once again that there is a God.

But you do have to admit that faith can work miracles.

Just ask P.T. "there is a sucker born every minute" Barnum. I believe that with a larger population the frequency is higher. I haven't run the numbers.
Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a profit.

MSimon
Posts: 14335
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:37 pm
Location: Rockford, Illinois
Contact:

Post by MSimon »

icarus,

The only secret about Polywell is the current results. All the rest is open.

And the Polywell folks are not claiming - it is a sure thing. I'd give it a 1 in 3 chance at the present time.
Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a profit.

icarus
Posts: 819
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 12:48 am

Post by icarus »

MSimon wrote:I have never heard of a business in normal times being willing to accept a plant that produces half its rated output with the promise that things will be better later.

What I would do as an engineer is to recommend that there be no acceptance until we got what we paid for.

This does not ring true.

I expect that the next thing we will see is that the "470" is a typo and the real number is "970".

Although in a conservatively designed piece of eqpt. I'd expect to see numbers like "1,030" indicating that the plant has some reserve margin for the inevitable degradation with age. Or possible missteps in installation.

Of course if the secret customer and the secretive Rossi are in collusion all bets are off. Well not yet to be sure. Eventually the marks (most of them) wise up. The rest get fleeced. Proving once again that there is a God.

But you do have to admit that faith can work miracles.

Just ask P.T. "there is a sucker born every minute" Barnum. I believe that with a larger population the frequency is higher. I haven't run the numbers.
Perhaps you think testing a possibly revolutionary energy source is "normal times" is probably what you are missing ...?

Oh, he's got an LENR reactor working but it is 'only" producing 470 kW ... think I'll pass on that one.... uh-huh.

MSimon
Posts: 14335
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:37 pm
Location: Rockford, Illinois
Contact:

Post by MSimon »

icarus wrote:
MSimon wrote:I have never heard of a business in normal times being willing to accept a plant that produces half its rated output with the promise that things will be better later.

What I would do as an engineer is to recommend that there be no acceptance until we got what we paid for.

This does not ring true.

I expect that the next thing we will see is that the "470" is a typo and the real number is "970".

Although in a conservatively designed piece of eqpt. I'd expect to see numbers like "1,030" indicating that the plant has some reserve margin for the inevitable degradation with age. Or possible missteps in installation.

Of course if the secret customer and the secretive Rossi are in collusion all bets are off. Well not yet to be sure. Eventually the marks (most of them) wise up. The rest get fleeced. Proving once again that there is a God.

But you do have to admit that faith can work miracles.

Just ask P.T. "there is a sucker born every minute" Barnum. I believe that with a larger population the frequency is higher. I haven't run the numbers.
Perhaps you think testing a possibly revolutionary energy source is "normal times" is probably what you are missing ...?

Oh, he's got an LENR reactor working but it is 'only" producing 470 kW ... think I'll pass on that one.... uh-huh.
You have independent verification of 470 KW?
Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a profit.

icarus
Posts: 819
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 12:48 am

Post by icarus »

MSimon wrote:
icarus wrote:
MSimon wrote:I have never heard of a business in normal times being willing to accept a plant that produces half its rated output with the promise that things will be better later.

What I would do as an engineer is to recommend that there be no acceptance until we got what we paid for.

This does not ring true.

I expect that the next thing we will see is that the "470" is a typo and the real number is "970".

Although in a conservatively designed piece of eqpt. I'd expect to see numbers like "1,030" indicating that the plant has some reserve margin for the inevitable degradation with age. Or possible missteps in installation.

Of course if the secret customer and the secretive Rossi are in collusion all bets are off. Well not yet to be sure. Eventually the marks (most of them) wise up. The rest get fleeced. Proving once again that there is a God.

But you do have to admit that faith can work miracles.

Just ask P.T. "there is a sucker born every minute" Barnum. I believe that with a larger population the frequency is higher. I haven't run the numbers.
Perhaps you think testing a possibly revolutionary energy source is "normal times" is probably what you are missing ...?

Oh, he's got an LENR reactor working but it is 'only" producing 470 kW ... think I'll pass on that one.... uh-huh.
You have independent verification of 470 KW?
No, but I've got 3 or 4 neutrons, give me $10 million and I'll build you the best fusion reactor .... EVER!

Skipjack
Posts: 6898
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 2:29 pm

Post by Skipjack »

I admit that this went better than what I would have guessed.
The alleged net power output seems to be lower than predicted by Rossi, but that could have all sorts of reasons.
I dont want to get tooo excited, but I have to say that I have to adjust my stance to a 60:40 now. 60% chance that it works and 40% chance that it does not.
Against all predictions, the thing did not explode. So I guess Rossi is either a better engineer than predicted, or really clever at hiding the fact that his machine does not work (and therefore had no chance at exploding).
The fact that he managed to convince an actual client does give his claims quite a bit more credibility, but there are still margins for errors and the possibility of fraud.
Thats why I say 60:40...
If you call me an unconvinceable sceptic now, then you should remember that I used to be 90% sure that this was not working/fraud/self delusion until the recent test.
So yeah, if he really is a fraud, the he deserves all the money he is getting out of it for being that good!
So hats off to Rossi, one way or the other!

Axil
Posts: 935
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2009 6:34 am

Post by Axil »

parallel wrote:Wonder what these geniuses will write now. Does TomClarke still insist LENR doesn't exist?
Any guesses? Obviously instrument/measurement error. It's only 470kW Easy to get that wrong.
Helius

All Rossi does is generate buzz among the really stupid. Nowhere in all these threads can any of this be characterized as good science, engineering, or business. Moron to thief cash flows aren't as old as hooking, but really old nevertheless.
TomClarke


Well, funding Rossi is no more extravagant than funding people to stare at goats...

Instead of keeping his head down, or demonstrtaing working truck, he demonstrates a truck which cannot actually move but claims it is working. Not very practical. Or truthful.

Anyone can be wrong; we all should honor that in humility. It will be interesting to hear from these naysayer guys when the dust settles from the test. It will be interesting to see how long they persist in their opinions. I suspect that there will be a half-life in the duration of their resistance. Throughout the long march of human knowledge, this is the way that the birth of a new paradigm is always treated.

The supporters of the E-Cat ideal likewise need to admit their error in abject humility if by chance this E-Cat monster system turns out to be a scam after all.

At this juncture, the situation is not yet resolved. I am hopeful that within a small passage of time that the truth will eventually be revealed.

Post Reply